Kaiser Development Co. v. City & County of Honolulu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• right of first refusal not a compensable interest in regulatory taking challenge
• right of first refusal not a compensable interest in regulatory taking challenge
• property owners' claim that they had a vested right to assurances they could develop their property had no merit for a number of reasons, including that municipalities may not bind themselves to future zoning or other legislative decisions
• variance not required where it would be futile to pursue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).