Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 5/8/2002
Robles v. State
Citations
- 85 S.W.3d 211
- 2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 97
- 2002 WL 893213
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that in prosecution for third or subsequent DWI, State was required to accept stipulation that defendant had two prior convictions rather than offer proof of prior convictions
- holding that in prosecution for third or subsequent DWI, State was required to accept stipulation that defendant had two prior convictions rather than offer proof of prior convictions
- holding that in prosecution for third or subsequent DWI, State was required to accept stipulation that defendant had two prior convictions rather than offer proof of prior convictions
- holding it is error to admit evidence of prior convictions over offer to stipulate to jurisdictional priors because of the danger of unfair prejudice
- explaining that policy, embodied in Texas Rule of Evidence 404(b) and bifurcated trial procedure, “addresses [court’s] concern that conviction not be based on the assumption that the accused is a criminal generally or that he is a person of bad character”
- discussing whether convictions could be introduced into evidence at the guilt stage of the trial, but not addressing whether the jury may be informed of the stipulation or whether the stipulation itself may be admitted into evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Price, Meyers, Womack, Johnson, Holcomb, Keasler, Keller, Hervey, Cochran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Moses v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-05-21· cited 1,033×
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-04-06· cited 134×
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-06-28· cited 132×
- Hollen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-09-10· cited 102×
- Weaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-09-11· cited 73×
- Ford v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-07-31· cited 56×
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-07-02· cited 47×
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-11-21· cited 41×
- Donald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2018-02-27· cited 40×
- Peters v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-03-19· cited 30×
- Harvey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-09-07· cited 27×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-06-01· cited 27×
- Davila v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2009-01-29· cited 19×
- Hollen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-08-08· cited 15×
- Bryant v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-03-10· cited 10×
- State v. MorganTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2003-09-10· cited 8×
- James Howard Taylor v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2014-08-08· cited 8×
- Herring v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2003-11-05· cited 5×
- Christopher Crawford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-06-23· cited 5×
- Smith v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2004-10-21· cited 2×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Montgomery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-19· cited 7,264×
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 2,913×
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 1,230×
- Vanderbilt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-09-23· cited 302×
- Tamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-01-05· cited 235×
- Brumfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-03-19· cited 200×
- James v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1999-08-25· cited 42×
- Luedke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-05-07· cited 34×
- Robles v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-04-13· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.