Luedke v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that felony and misdemeanor DWI are separate offenses because “[a] prior conviction is an essential element of felony driving while intoxicated,” but “[i]t is not an element of the misdemeanor offense”
• recognizing that felony and misdemeanor DWI are separate offenses because A [a] prior conviction is an essential element of felony driving while intoxicated, @ but A [i]t is not an element of the misdemeanor offense @
• construing Art. 6701l-2, V.A.C.S., which established one prior conviction as an element of felony DWI, to require proof of the prior conviction at the guilt/innocence stage of trial in order to authorize a conviction
• construing Art. 6701 l -2, V.A.C.S., which established one prior conviction as an element of felony DWI, to require proof of the prior conviction at the guilt/innocence stage of trial in order to authorize a conviction
• text of old version of TEX . REV . CIV . STAT . art. 6701l-2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).