Skip to main content
· 7/28/1983

Robinson & Wells, P.C. v. Warren

Citations

  • 669 P.2d 844
  • 1983 Utah LEXIS 1120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that relevant statutory provisions contemplated that motions to vacate, to modify, or to correct arbitration award be before court when it rules on motion to confirm
  • concluding that relevant statutory provisions contemplated that motions to vacate, to modify, or to correct arbitration award be before court when it rules on motion to confirm
  • discussing the two bases separately, the filed-outside-statutory-time-limit basis being noted only in footnote as alternative ground for disposition
  • “[J]udicial review of arbitration awards ... should be strictly limited to the statutory grounds and procedures for review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oaks, Hall, Stewart, Howe, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.