· 7/28/1983
Robinson & Wells, P.C. v. Warren
Citations
- 669 P.2d 844
- 1983 Utah LEXIS 1120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that relevant statutory provisions contemplated that motions to vacate, to modify, or to correct arbitration award be before court when it rules on motion to confirm
- concluding that relevant statutory provisions contemplated that motions to vacate, to modify, or to correct arbitration award be before court when it rules on motion to confirm
- discussing the two bases separately, the filed-outside-statutory-time-limit basis being noted only in footnote as alternative ground for disposition
- “[J]udicial review of arbitration awards ... should be strictly limited to the statutory grounds and procedures for review.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Oaks, Hall, Stewart, Howe, Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.