Hamm v. Millennium Income Fund, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the trial court was entitled to summarily deny an untimely motion to vacate or modify an arbitration award
• noting that a party who moves to vacate, modify, or correct an arbitration award after the award has been confirmed and final judgment rendered has waived that challenge
• likening grounds for vacatur to affirmative defenses under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 94
• stating appellate court may not evaluate trial judge = s ruling on arbitration award based on materials not presented to judge before such ruling
• parties’ continuance motion not verified or accompanied by affidavit, and “[f]or th[at] reason alone,” trial court did not err in overruling continuance motion
• “The trial court had no discretion but to confirm the arbitration award if the Hamm parties did not file a motion to vacate or to modify (or otherwise challenge in any way) the award before the ruling on Millennium’s motion to confirm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).