Skip to main content

Robinson v. State

Citations

  • 707 S.W.2d 47
  • 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that agreed resets were equivalent to continuances and thus not included in calculations because Act excluded time attributable to requested and agreed continuances from statutory deadlines
  • explaining that agreed resets were the equivalent to continuances and thus were not included in the threshold delay calculations because the Speedy Trial Act excluded time attributable to requested and agreed continuances from the statutory deadlines
  • provisions of criminal code including speedy trial act do not apply until juvenile is transferred to criminal court
  • the Code of Criminal Procedure does not apply to juvenile proceedings
  • construing Tex. Code Crim.PROC.Ann. art. 32A.02

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Teague, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.