Robinson v. SAIF Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing recovery of worker’s compensation benefits for chemical exposure, based on treating physicians’ opinions, although exact etiology of disease was undetermined

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bruns v. Paccar, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-01-17· cited 46×
• Earl v. Cryovac, a Division of W.R. Grace Co.
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1989-04-05· cited 21×
• Clark v. Erdman Meat Packing
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-10-21· cited 3×
• Canavan's Case
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1999-12-01· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Matter of Compensation of Bracke
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-06-22· cited 87×
• James v. State Accident Insurance Fund
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-01-20· cited 59×
• State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Gygi
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-01-25· cited 40×
• Dethlefs v. Hyster Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-07-19· cited 37×
• Hutcheson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-11-06· cited 33×
• Weiland v. SAIF Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-10-05· cited 13×
• Robinson v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-08-29· cited 4×
• Reining v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-02-22· cited 3×