James v. State Accident Insurance Fund

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the reason- ing in O’Neal v. Sisters of Providence, 22 Or App 9, 16, 537 P2d 580 (1975
• adopting the reason- ing in O’Neal v. Sisters of Providence, 22 Or App 9, 16, 537 P2d 580 (1975
• adopting the reason- ing in O’Neal v. Sisters of Providence, 22 Or App 9, 16, 537 P2d 580 (1975), which concluded that what set occupational diseases apart from accidental injuries is that they cannot be said to be unexpected and that they are gradual rather than sudden in onset
• adopting the reason- ing in O’Neal v. Sisters of Providence, 22 Or App 9, 16, 537 P2d 580 (1975), which concluded that what set occupational diseases apart from accidental injuries is that they cannot be said to be unexpected and that they are gradual rather than sudden in onset
• neurosis not an “injury” under workers’ compensation law because condition “developed gradually rather than suddenly”
• neurosis not an “injury” under workers’ compensation law because condition “developed gradually rather than suddenly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).