Robinson v. Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In agreeing to entry of an order for support exceeding that required under [the guidelines], parties may reach a bargained-for result based on their understanding of the circumstances when they enter into their agreement and their anticipation of contingent future events.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pursley v. Pursley
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2004-09-23· cited 27×
• Wright v. Wright
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2001-05-11· cited 7×
• Rosen v. Rosen
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2007-09-21· cited 4×
• Engeman v. Engeman
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2016-06-09· cited 4×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richmond v. Richmond
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1989-09-15· cited 60×
• Hunt v. Hunt
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1985-04-19· cited 50×
• Curley v. Curley
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-01-05· cited 46×
• Bergstrom v. Lindback
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1989-10-06· cited 39×
• Dewey v. Dewey
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1994-11-25· cited 37×
• Turinsky v. Long
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1996-02-02· cited 36×
• Patch v. Patch
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1988-08-26· cited 35×
• Bunn v. House
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1997-04-11· cited 35×
• Keane v. Local Boundary Commission
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1995-04-14· cited 34×
• Flannery v. Flannery
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1997-12-19· cited 31×
• Yerrington v. Yerrington
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1997-03-14· cited 15×
• Aga v. Aga
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1997-07-25· cited 3×