California Court of Appeal· 9/28/1987
Robinson v. McGinn
Citations
- 195 Cal. App. 3d 66
- 240 Cal. Rptr. 423
- 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 2165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “harm is ‘actual and appreciable’ only if and when it becomes irremediable”
- \harm is `actual and appreciable' only if and when it becomes irremediable\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-05-07· cited 191×
- National Secretarial Service, Inc. v. FroehlichCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-05-15· cited 99×
- Thomas v. ClearyAlaska Supreme Court· 1989-01-27· cited 39×
- California Aviation, Inc. v. LeedsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-08-23· cited 37×
- Worton v. WortonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-10-10· cited 35×
- Bostanian v. Liberty Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-02-19· cited 27×
- Goebel v. LauderdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-09-29· cited 22×
- Schrader v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-08-26· cited 21×
- Johnson v. SimonelliCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-06-12· cited 19×
- Kabbe v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-12-10· cited 17×
- Finlayson v. SanbrookCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-11-12· cited 16×
- In Re EasterbrookCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-03-08· cited 14×
- Turley v. WooldridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-05-23· cited 14×
- Johnson v. Haberman & KassoyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-05-24· cited 12×
- Sabes & Richman, Inc. v. MuenzerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-11-29· cited 9×
- J & K PAINTING CO. v. BradshawCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-05-30· cited 9×
- Amstone v. Peninsular Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-01-11· cited 5×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-12-02· cited 371×
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-12-02· cited 345×
- Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-06-03· cited 237×
- Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-01-22· cited 199×
- Electronic Equipment Express, Inc. v. Donald H. Seiler & Co.California Court of Appeal· 1981-08-21· cited 92×
- Southland Mechanical Constructors Corp. v. NixenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-05-21· cited 66×
- Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-07-06· cited 60×
- Ventura County Humane Society v. HollowayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-07-23· cited 54×
- Bledstein v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-11-28· cited 38×
- Bell v. HummelCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-10-26· cited 34×
- Bowman v. AbramsonE.D. Pennsylvania· 1982-07-27· cited 31×
- Valvo v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-03-07· cited 26×
- Simmons v. OceanVirgin Islands· 1982-08-16· cited 17×
- Kaley v. Catalina YachtsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-12-12· cited 17×
- People v. Kings Point Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1986-12-31· cited 14×
- Olson v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-05-02· cited 12×
- Wood v. LoweCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-05-21· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.