· 5/24/1988
Johnson v. Haberman & Kassoy
Citations
- 201 Cal. App. 3d 1468
- 247 Cal. Rptr. 614
- 1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 535
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \A client damaged in the context of an attorney-client relationship is under no duty to investigate his attorneys actions unless he has actual notice of facts sufficient to arouse the suspicions of a reasonable person.\
- \A client damaged in the context of an attorney-client relationship is under no duty to investigate his attorneys actions unless he has actual notice of facts sufficient to arouse the suspicions of a reasonable person.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.