California Court of Appeal· 5/24/1988
Johnson v. Haberman & Kassoy
Citations
- 201 Cal. App. 3d 1468
- 247 Cal. Rptr. 614
- 1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 535
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \A client damaged in the context of an attorney-client relationship is under no duty to investigate his attorneys actions unless he has actual notice of facts sufficient to arouse the suspicions of a reasonable person.\
- \A client damaged in the context of an attorney-client relationship is under no duty to investigate his attorneys actions unless he has actual notice of facts sufficient to arouse the suspicions of a reasonable person.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bennett v. McCallCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-10-04· cited 60×
- Asbestos Claims Facility v. Berry & BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-03-26· cited 43×
- Preblich v. ZoreaAlaska Supreme Court· 2000-03-10· cited 34×
- Breck v. MooreAlaska Supreme Court· 1996-02-02· cited 34×
- O'NEILL v. TichyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-10-04· cited 23×
- Finlayson v. SanbrookCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-11-12· cited 16×
- Mahon Vs. Howard & Howard Attorneys, Pllc C/W 81468Nevada Supreme Court· 2021-11-30
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-12-02· cited 371×
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-02-19· cited 209×
- Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-09-26· cited 156×
- Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-05-17· cited 155×
- Brown v. BleibergCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-09-27· cited 84×
- Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-08-08· cited 72×
- McGee v. WeinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-10-18· cited 65×
- Bledstein v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-11-28· cited 38×
- Gurkewitz v. HabermanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-11-12· cited 35×
- Shapero v. FliegelCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-05-04· cited 29×
- Robinson v. McGinnCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-09-28· cited 25×
- Baright v. WillisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-01-26· cited 24×
- Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-07-06· cited 19×
- Krusesky v. BaughCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-12-23· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.