Skip to main content
· 5/24/1988

Johnson v. Haberman & Kassoy

Citations

  • 201 Cal. App. 3d 1468
  • 247 Cal. Rptr. 614
  • 1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \A client damaged in the context of an attorney-client relationship is under no duty to investigate his attorneys actions unless he has actual notice of facts sufficient to arouse the suspicions of a reasonable person.\
  • \A client damaged in the context of an attorney-client relationship is under no duty to investigate his attorneys actions unless he has actual notice of facts sufficient to arouse the suspicions of a reasonable person.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.