Robinson v. Hertz Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a self-insured auto rental company need not provide uninsured motorist coverage to renters
• \The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in determining as a matter of law that Hertz had not voluntarily provided uninsured motorist coverage under the terms of the leasing agreement.\
• Lease agreement did not create coverage for uninsured motorist liability
• Lease agreement did not create coverage for uninsured motorist liability.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).