Coley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that a policy containing the term “live with” does not present “ambiguity which would require us to construe the contract against defendant or go behind the contract to consider its underlying purpose.”
• “Unless it is obvious that the language in a policy is used in a technical connotation, the language is accorded the meaning which common experience imparts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).