Skip to main content

Robinson v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 413 S.E.2d 885
  • 13 Va. App. 574
  • 8 Va. Law Rep. 1971
  • 1992 Va. App. LEXIS 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a party must object with specificity to give the trial court an opportunity to rule in order to avoid unnecessary appeals and retrials
  • “These questions solicited irrelevant and highly prejudicial matters. . . . [T]he only conceivable purpose of the questions by the Commonwealth’s attorney was to inflame the passions of the jury against the accused and his witness.”
  • “The purpose of Rule 5A:18 is to avoid unnecessary appeals, reversals, and mistrials by requiring litigants to inform the trial judge of the action complained of so that the judge has the opportunity to consider the issue intelligently and take timely corrective action.”
  • “The purpose of the contemporaneous objection rule embodied in Rule 5A:18 is to inform the trial judge of the action complained of in order to give the judge the opportunity to consider the issue and to take timely corrective action . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.