Kentucky Supreme Court· 1/19/2006
Robinson v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 181 S.W.3d 30
- 2005 WL 2316181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding evidence of multiple bindles of drugs can support finding of guilt on charge of trafficking
- finding palpable error where Commonwealth in closing argument pointed to inaccurate testimony that good behavior credit could affect parole eligibility
- presentation of incorrect or false testimony during the sentencing phase in a drug prosecution
- incorrect or false testimony about the impact of good time. credit
- prosecutor’s incorrect statements regarding good time credit were misconduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Matheney v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2006-04-04· cited 67×
- Burke v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2016-12-15· cited 17×
- Kays v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2016-10-14· cited 14×
- Fegley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2011-04-01· cited 13×
- Cox v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2013-05-23· cited 1×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- Commonwealth v. BenhamKentucky Supreme Court· 1991-09-26· cited 794×
- Commonwealth v. SawhillKentucky Supreme Court· 1983-11-23· cited 310×
- James v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2002-04-19· cited 187×
- Kotila v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2003-06-12· cited 52×
- Davis v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1998-06-18· cited 49×
- Burnett v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2000-11-22· cited 45×
- Martin v. ChandlerKentucky Supreme Court· 2003-12-18· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.