Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1/7/1937
Robinson v. Attapulgus Clay Co.
Citations
- 55 Ga. App. 141
- 189 S.E. 555
- 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding, under renewal statute then in effect, that “a suit which has been dismissed and renewed, even in the same court, may be demurred to on renewal, although no demurrer was interposed in the original action”
- concluding, under renewal statute then in effect, that “a suit which has been dismissed and renewed, even in the same court, may be demurred to on renewal, although no demurrer was interposed in the original action”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Guerrt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hopkins v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia· 1976-10-19· cited 34×
- Hornsby v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-02-25· cited 19×
- Champion v. RakesCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-06-20· cited 12×
- Champion v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-09-09· cited 12×
- Standford v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1962-04-11· cited 11×
- SunTrust Bank v. LillistonSupreme Court of Georgia· 2018-01-29· cited 10×
- Allan Wayne Morton v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1983-05-17· cited 9×
- Crutchfield v. LawsonSupreme Court of Georgia· 2014-01-21· cited 4×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1922-11-27· cited 384×
- Grace v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court· 1883-11-19· cited 277×
- In Re MooreSupreme Court· 1908-04-20· cited 213×
- Ex Parte WisnerSupreme Court· 1906-12-10· cited 202×
- Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1890-04-29· cited 139×
- Lee v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1923-01-22· cited 129×
- Continental Insurance v. RhoadsSupreme Court· 1886-11-29· cited 96×
- United States v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court· 1887-01-31· cited 83×
- Warax v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky· 1896-07-01· cited 59×
- Arrowsmith v. Nashville & D. R.Circuit Court of Tennessee· 1893-07-27· cited 44×
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Galbreath Cattle Co.Supreme Court· 1926-04-19· cited 33×
- Harding v. Standard Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois· 1910-10-25· cited 20×
- Neel v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court· 1895-03-11· cited 19×
- Garfield Oil Mills v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1915-08-04· cited 12×
- Hinman v. BarrettN.D. New York· 1917-08-21· cited 6×
- Evans v. Sioux City Service Co.N.D. Iowa· 1913-08-18· cited 3×
- English v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1910-01-15· cited 2×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1915-04-20· cited 2×
- Pullman Co. v. SutherlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1919-11-19· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.