Ex Parte Wisner
Citations
- 203 U.S. 449
- 27 S. Ct. 150
- 51 L. Ed. 264
- 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1608
Syllabus
<p>The Supreme Court of the United St'ates alone possesses jurisdiction derived immediately from the Constitution and of which the legislative power cannot deprive it; that of the Circuit Court depends on some act of Congress.</p> <p>No suit which could not have been originally brought in the Circuit Court pf the United States can be removed therein from the state court.</p> <p>'Under §§ 1, 2, 3, of the act of March 3, 1875, 18 Stat. 470, as amended by the act of March 1, 1887, 24 Stat. 552, corrected by the act of August 13, 1888, 25 Stat. 433, an action commenced in a state court, by a citizen of another State, against a non-resident defendant who is a citizen of a State other than that of the plaintiff cannot be removed by the defendant into the Circuit Court of the United States.</p> <p>Where the Circuit Court refuses to remand to the state court a case removed to it, but over which it has no jurisdiction, mandamus from this court is the proper remedy and not prohibition.</p>
Judges: Fuller, Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
171 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court· 1960-06-13· cited 1,026×
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court· 1939-11-22· cited 770×
- Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court· 1932-04-11· cited 745×
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1922-11-27· cited 384×
- Washington v. W. C. Dawson & Co.Supreme Court· 1924-02-25· cited 268×
- In the Matter of Emanuel JosephsonFirst Circuit· 1954-12-23· cited 230×
- In Re MooreSupreme Court· 1908-04-20· cited 213×
- Lee v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1923-01-22· cited 129×
- Ex Parte HardingSupreme Court· 1911-02-20· cited 122×
- Western Loan & Savings Co. v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1908-06-01· cited 108×
- In Re WinnSupreme Court· 1909-05-03· cited 94×
- Ex Parte NebraskaSupreme Court· 1908-04-20· cited 86×
- Lehigh Valley Coal Co. v. YensavageSecond Circuit· 1914-10-27· cited 58×
- Panama R. v. JohnsonSecond Circuit· 1923-02-15· cited 56×
- Horn v. Pere Marquette R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan· 1907-02-11· cited 54×
- McPhee & McGinnity Co. v. Union Pac. R.Eighth Circuit· 1907-11-27· cited 51×
- General Inv. Co. v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co.Sixth Circuit· 1918-02-16· cited 46×
- Shanberg v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkEighth Circuit· 1907-11-04· cited 43×
- McLaughlin Brothers v. HallowellSupreme Court· 1913-04-07· cited 41×
- Briney v. Burley (In Re Burley)C.D. California· 1981-05-28· cited 39×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court· 1812-03-14· cited 761×
- Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court· 1894-03-19· cited 409×
- Turner, Administrator of Stanley, in Error v. The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of North AmericaSupreme Court· 1799-08-17· cited 339×
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1892-05-16· cited 303×
- Louisville Trust Co. v. ComingorSupreme Court· 1902-01-27· cited 218×
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court· 1891-05-25· cited 163×
- In Re Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court· 1890-12-22· cited 150×
- McIntire v. WoodSupreme Court· 1813-03-15· cited 137×
- Smith v. LyonSupreme Court· 1890-02-03· cited 119×
- Central Trust Co. v. McGeorgeSupreme Court· 1894-01-03· cited 101×
- McCormick Harvesting MacHine Co. v. WalthersSupreme Court· 1890-03-03· cited 60×
- Stevenson v. FainSupreme Court· 1904-11-07· cited 46×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.