Robidoux v. Muholland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining choice of law and stating that, \the issue here pertains to the application of workers' compensation immunity rules\
• determining choice of law and stating that, “the issue here pertains to the application of workers’ compensation immunity rules”
• applying Massachusetts law and determining that a special employer was not liable for workers’ compensation and so not immune, even though the special employer paid the general employer a rate that “effectively reimbursed” the general employer for workers’ compensation insurance
• “‘[b]ecause some of the relevant factors are either redundant or not determinative, we focus on considerations particularly relevant to the case’”
• applying de novo review to choice of law determinations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).