Jasty v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, under Massachusetts law, “individual contract provisions” should not be read in “isolation,” and that term was “unambiguous” when read with the rest of the contract
• rejecting argument that assertion of prejudgment interest claim for the first time in postjudgment motion waived the claim
• no ch. 93A violation where party's conduct was based on genuine dispute about what contract required
• no ch. 93A violation where party’s conduct was based on genuine dispute about what contract required
• “There is a substantial presumption in favor of a plaintiff's choice of forum.”
• “There is a substantial presumption in favor of a plaintiff's choice of forum.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).