Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/27/2002
Robertson v. Robertson
Citations
- 54 P.3d 708
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court lacked inherent authority to ignore statutory deadline for filing a particular type of motion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seinfeld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rettkowski v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court· 1996-02-01· cited 153×
- Aetna Life Insurance v. Washington Life & Disability Insurance Guaranty Ass'nWashington Supreme Court· 1974-03-21· cited 143×
- City of Seattle v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court· 1991-05-16· cited 121×
- State v. BlilieWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-03· cited 106×
- Harmon v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 99×
- Harmon v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV.Washington Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 97×
- State v. AzpitarteWashington Supreme Court· 2000-03-09· cited 86×
- State v. WadsworthWashington Supreme Court· 2000-01-13· cited 56×
- State v. MollichiWashington Supreme Court· 1997-05-08· cited 56×
- Fisher Bros. Corp. v. Des Moines Sewer Dist.Washington Supreme Court· 1982-05-26· cited 28×
- Bowman v. BowmanWashington Supreme Court· 1969-10-23· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.