Bowman v. Bowman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where “the anticipated situation of being fully self-supporting had not materialized, through no substantial fault of respondent,” “[t]he court found that this was a material change of conditions and that she was, therefore, entitled to the continuation of alimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Marriage of Harshman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-07-18· cited 34×
• In re the Marriage of Drlik
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-04-06· cited 28×
• In Re Marriage of Drlik
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-04-06· cited 27×
• In Re the Marriage of Olsen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-09-19· cited 17×
• In Re the Marriage of Young
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-09-09· cited 14×
• Robertson v. Robertson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-27· cited 11×
• In re the Marriage of Robertson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-27· cited 11×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chase v. Chase
  Washington Supreme Court· 1968-08-01· cited 76×
• Ovens v. Ovens
  Washington Supreme Court· 1962-12-13· cited 28×
• Christopher v. Christopher
  Washington Supreme Court· 1963-05-02· cited 13×