Robertson v. GMAC Mortgage LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the privilege did not apply where the attorney participated in the decision-making process of a personnel review committee whose “primary function . . . was to determine appropriate employment action to take against an employee”
• \[A] corporate client should not be allowed to conceal a fact by disclosing it to the corporate attorney.\
• “[C]ommunications by a corporation with its attorney, who is at the time acting solely in his capacity as a business advisor, would not be privileged” (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).