Federal Trade Commission v. Stefanchik

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “mere scintilla” of evidence is insufficient to overcome summary judgment
• noting that \[a] non-movant's bald assertions or a mere scintilla of evidence in his favor are both insufficient to withstand summary judgment.\
• holding “the district court did not abuse its discretion by holding the defendants liable for the full amount of loss incurred by consumers”
• affirming summary judgment for plaintiff where defendants failed to 12 show significantly probative evidence to dispute plaintiff’s evidence
• affirming restitution of over $17 million for the full amount of consumer loss
• “A non-movant’s bald assertions or a mere scintilla of evidence are both insufficient to withstand summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).