Roberts v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Only drug offenses relating to the purchase or the possession of controlled substances are exempt from habitualization; defendants sentenced for offenses relating to the sale of narcotics do not enjoy the benefit of this statutory exemption.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Vila v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-10-28· cited 12×
• Virgil v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-10· cited 8×
• NORRIS HUBBARD, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-03-21
• HERBERT MC ELROY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-17
• KENTA MOORE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-08-21
• Lloyd Anthony Davis v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-07-03

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gregory v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-20· cited 9×
• McInnis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-09-23· cited 8×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-03· cited 5×
• Bauer v. Maestri
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2001-02-28· cited 1×