Gregory v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the erroneous imposition of a habitual offender sentence for possession of a controlled substance is a serious, patent sentencing error that may be reviewed for the first time on direct appeal
• holding that the erroneous imposition of a habitual offender sentence for possession with intent to sell a controlled substance is a serious, patent sentencing error that may be reviewed for the first time on direct appeal
• correcting the same type of unpreserved error although defendant pleaded guilty, because it is serious and patent
• correcting the same type of unpreserved error although defendant pleaded guilty, because it is serious and patent
• reversing erroneous imposition of habitual offender sentence even though defendant did not object during the sentencing hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Maddox v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-05-11· cited 262×
• Roberts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-09· cited 6×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-03· cited 5×
• Landreth v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-30· cited 3×
• Wade v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-26· cited 3×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-18· cited 2×
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-22· cited 1×
• Stewart v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-29· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Reyes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-15· cited 332×
• Denson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-13· cited 23×