Court of Appeals of Alaska· 8/10/2007
Roberts v. State
Citations
- 164 P.3d 664
- 2007 Alas. App. LEXIS 163
- 2007 WL 2285441
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that there might be cases where the due process clause of the Alaska Constitution would require an exception to the statutory bar against successive applications
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court· 1991-04-16· cited 3,331×
- Burton v. StewartSupreme Court· 2007-01-09· cited 1,506×
- Grinols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2000-10-13· cited 46×
- Brett Lang v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2007-01-24· cited 33×
- Pease v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2002-09-27· cited 20×
- Burton v. WaddingtonNinth Circuit· 2005-07-28· cited 8×
- State v. PeaseCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2007-07-27· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.