Skip to main content

Roberts v. State

Citations

  • 795 S.W.2d 842
  • 1990 Tex. App. LEXIS 2447
  • 1990 WL 146646

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that vulgar allegations in letter that appellant complained of were expressions of threat to the complainant and thus had probative value
  • holding that vulgar allegations in letter that appellant complained of were expressions of threat to the complainant and thus had probative value
  • stating that defendant’s letter—threatening the victim of aggravated sexual assault with incarceration for bigamy and tax evasion if she did not get the district attorney to drop charges against him—was an attempt to suppress testimony of a witness
  • stating that defendant = s letter C threatening the victim of aggravated sexual assault with incarceration for bigamy and tax evasion if she did not get the district attorney to drop charges against him C was an attempt to suppress testimony of a witness
  • defendant’s conviction of lesser included offense sustained when lesser included offense had been charged in separate indictment and State elected to go under greater offense and submit charge in separate indictment as lesser included offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burgess

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.