Skip to main content

Roberts v. People

Citations

  • 130 P.3d 1005
  • 2006 WL 321168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that whether a district court may award prejudgment interest on the amount of restitution implicates the legality of a sentence because it’s an issue of whether the prejudgment interest is authorized by statute
  • noting prejudgment interest is based on the loss of use of the stolen money
  • section 18-1.3-603(4)(a) allows for collection of a restitution award “without the time and expense necessary to file an additional civil action”
  • Prejudgment interest should be awarded from the time the money is stolen “to the time a restitution award is entered.”
  • “The word ‘also’ implies . . . in addition to . . . .”
  • defendants must pay post-Judgment interest until the restitution order is paid in full

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.