Robert Murdock v. Odie Washington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Title I did not apply because plaintiff was “an inmate of the prison, not an employee or job applicant”
• finding that an Illinois prisoner had an adequate post-deprivation remedy in state court for confiscated personal property
• affirming dismissal of plaintiff’s property loss claims because state law provides post deprivation remedy
• affirming dismissal of inmate’s challenge to denial of access to jail program based on refusal to submit to HIV test because inmate alleged he was not HIV‐positive and policy applied to all inmates
• no due process violation because state claims court is adequate post-deprivation remedy
• inmate had no liberty or property interest in attending culinary arts program

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).