Ninth Circuit· 2/23/2016

Robert Moiser v. Stonefield Josephson, Inc.

Citations

815 F.3d 1161
2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3118
2016 WL 703104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that where a receiver alleges conduct 3 that caused a corporation “additional losses,” the corporation has suffered an injury for 4 which a receiver is authorized to seek recovery
explaining that the plaintiff’s “failure to come forward with any substantial evidence of causation . . . is also fatal to his claim of unjust enrichment”
“Normally, we do not consider on appeal issues not properly raised before the district court.”
“As a matter of law, a quasi-contract action for unjust enrichment does not lie where, as here, express binding agreements exist and define the parties’ rights.”
“[A]s a matter of law, a quasi-contract action for 2 unjust enrichment does not lie where, as here, express binding agreements exist and define the 3 parties’ rights.”
“as a matter of law, a 15 quasi-contract action for unjust enrichment does not lie where, as here, express binding 16 agreements exist and define the parties’ rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harry, Pregerson, Stafford, Stephen, Trott, William

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.