Robert Camel Contracting, Inc. v. Krautscheid

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that ORS 20.077 was merely procedural, and therefore retroactive in effect, because it “neither offers nor alters any rights; it does not provide for a remedy in the form of costs or otherwise, unless the underlying contract or statute so provides”
• considering staff measure summaries as part of the analysis of the legislative history of a statute
• considering a staff measure summary as part of the analysis of the legislative history of a statute
• considering a staff measure summary as part of the analysis of the legislative history of a statute
• mentioning legislative history “because it was offered by the parties,” citing ORS 174.020(1)(b)
• in actions involving multiple claims, ORS 20.077 requires that the court “determine the prevailing party on each claim and award attorney fees accordingly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).