Skip to main content
· 3/31/2004

STATE EX REL. JUV. DEPT. v. Nicholls

Citations

  • 87 P.3d 680
  • 192 Or. App. 604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, in examining the text, the court looks first for the presence of an explicit retro-activity clause
  • if a statute is remedial, it presumptively applies retroactively; if it is substantive, it presumptively applies prospectively
  • “[W]hen a statute lacks an express retroactivity clause, the legislative record is typically silent and of no assistance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Ortega, Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.