Roberson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that supplemental charge did not violate article 36.16 when trial court became convinced that it had given erroneous charge
• holding that supplemental charge did not violate article 36.16 when trial court became convinced that it had given erroneous charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2005-07-07· cited 57×
• Douglas Lynn Kirk v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2014-01-23· cited 52×
• Danny Lee Bell, Sr. A/K/A Danny Lee Bell v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-07-07
• Kody Kothmann v. Clint Cook
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2003-06-27
• in the Interest of J.R. and A.G.S., Children
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2010-08-25
• Anthony Ray Willis v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2010-08-25
• Kenneth McMichael v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2019-08-29
• Blanca Martinez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2021-03-31
• Robert Alexander Tuft v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2023-08-31

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-03-08· cited 294×
• Dusek v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-11-18· cited 88×
• Moore v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-06-09· cited 27×
• Garza v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-09-13· cited 27×
• Wilbon v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1997-03-26· cited 9×
• Seals v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2002-11-14· cited 4×