Robbins v. Robbins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ex parte communication alone is legally sufficient to require recusal
• stating that the allegation that the ex-wife socialized with the trial judge was legally sufficient to require recusal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pearson v. Pearson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-26· cited 3×
• R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY v. SAUNDRA ALONSO, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF FRANCIS ALONSO
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-06· cited 3×
• Whitaker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-10-20· cited 2×
• Berry v. Berry
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-24

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rose v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-05-28· cited 60×
• Barnett v. Barnett
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-17· cited 20×
• Brake v. Murphy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-07· cited 19×
• Rollins v. Baker
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-13· cited 10×
• Scholz v. Hauser
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-07-13· cited 6×