District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/7/1997
Brake v. Murphy
Citations
- 693 So. 2d 663
- 1997 WL 227456
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that evidence of ex parte communication between the judge and the opposing party necessitated recusal
- holding that evidence of ex parte eommvmication between the judge and the opposing party necessitated recusal
- holding that a disqualification motion was timely when filed within days of actual discovery of facts giving rise to the motion even though documents con taining information had been in party’s possession for more than ten days
- reversing an order that required the personal representative and her husband to post a bond in order to file further pleadings in a surcharge proceeding because the order violated the access to the courts provision and due process clause of the state constitution
- trial court did not abuse discretion in assessing surcharge against personal representative for litigation involving estate
- \[T]here is no abuse of discretion in conditioning an eve of trial continuance on payment of attorney's fees caused by delay.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Nesbitt and Jorgenson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services v. Broward CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-15· cited 19×
- HIP Health Plan of Florida, Inc. v. GriffinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-24· cited 5×
- Robbins v. RobbinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-27· cited 5×
- Brake v. SwanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-19· cited 4×
- Carter v. HoweyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-06· cited 4×
- Holter v. DohnanskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-09· cited 3×
- The Florida Bar v. BrakeSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-07· cited 3×
- Pearson v. PearsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-26· cited 3×
- R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY v. SAUNDRA ALONSO, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF FRANCIS ALONSODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-06· cited 3×
- EDIOL TOPALLI v. EDDIE FELICIANODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-03-22· cited 3×
- Murphy v. NBD Trust Co. of Florida, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-25· cited 1×
- Brake v. SwanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-14· cited 1×
- Brake v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-23· cited 1×
- Haas v. YousefDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-09-26
- Mitzner v. MitznerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-11
- Lamb v. LambDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-29
- MacDonald v. MaurielloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-15
- B.D., the Mother v. Department of Children and FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-02-26
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Livingston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-10-27· cited 182×
- Fischer v. KnuckSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-11-06· cited 146×
- Strazzulla v. HendrickSupreme Court of Florida· 1965-06-30· cited 124×
- Hayslip v. DouglasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-07-01· cited 96×
- Rose v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-05-28· cited 60×
- Hanson v. HansonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-30· cited 17×
- Flea Market, USA, Inc. v. CohenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-06-24· cited 11×
- Rollins v. BakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-13· cited 10×
- Pistorino v. FergusonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-07-29· cited 10×
- State ex rel. Jensen v. Cannon ex rel. Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-06-17· cited 7×
- Brake v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-22· cited 5×
- Brake v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-12· cited 3×
- Garner v. MartinezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-05· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.