Skip to main content

Brake v. Murphy

Citations

  • 693 So. 2d 663
  • 1997 WL 227456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence of ex parte communication between the judge and the opposing party necessitated recusal
  • holding that evidence of ex parte eommvmication between the judge and the opposing party necessitated recusal
  • holding that a disqualification motion was timely when filed within days of actual discovery of facts giving rise to the motion even though documents con taining information had been in party’s possession for more than ten days
  • reversing an order that required the personal representative and her husband to post a bond in order to file further pleadings in a surcharge proceeding because the order violated the access to the courts provision and due process clause of the state constitution
  • trial court did not abuse discretion in assessing surcharge against personal representative for litigation involving estate
  • \[T]here is no abuse of discretion in conditioning an eve of trial continuance on payment of attorney's fees caused by delay.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Nesbitt and Jorgenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.