Skip to main content

Rivers v. State

Citations

  • 425 So. 2d 101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • comparing specificity of various requests for instructions throughout proceedings, but ultimately finding request marginally preserved despite ineptness of language
  • \[W]e are compelled to hold that the failure to give the [Williams rule] instruction during the course of the trial . . . was reversible error.\
  • error “marginally preserved for appellate review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larry G. Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.