Court of Appeals of Maryland· 6/10/2009
Rivera v. State
Citations
- 973 A.2d 218
- 409 Md. 176
- 2009 Md. LEXIS 195
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding that a probation before judgment constitutes a conviction in the context of a coram nobis petition
- holding that facts that “Rivera engaged in anal intercourse with his daughter and ‘ended upon on top’ of [her] while rubbing her back” “provided a sufficient factual basis to support the conclusion that Mr. Rivera violated § 3-828”
- noting that pending deportation proceedings provide a “significant collateral consequence” for coram nobis relief
- noting that pending deportation proceedings provide a “significant collateral consequence” for coram nobis relief
- noting that “the record does not reflect that the State or the trial judge made Mr. Rivera any assurances about the actions that [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] would or would not pursue in the future”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene, Murphy, Raker, Wilner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DaughtryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-25· cited 56×
- David Scott Daughenbaugh v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa· 2011-10-21· cited 36×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-07-13· cited 29×
- Peterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-03-31· cited 25×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-05-02· cited 21×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-12-07· cited 20×
- State v. Sanmartin PradoCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-11· cited 18×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-29· cited 18×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-26· cited 7×
- State v. DENISYUKCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-29· cited 6×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-10-01· cited 2×
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-08-29
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court· 1954-02-08· cited 1,436×
- United States v. David Allen Hagen Defusco, (Two Cases)Fourth Circuit· 1991-11-22· cited 1,300×
- United States v. Richard J. FronteroFifth Circuit· 1971-11-30· cited 134×
- Madison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-23· cited 84×
- Metheny v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-07-24· cited 81×
- Skok v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-10-10· cited 75×
- McCall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-03-19· cited 51×
- Myers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-09-05· cited 46×
- Ruby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-22· cited 34×
- State v. HannahCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-09-04· cited 34×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-12· cited 32×
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-09-21· cited 29×
- State v. ThorntonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-12-02· cited 19×
- Abrams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-09-10· cited 18×
- Rivera v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-07-03· cited 9×
- State v. ChaceSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2004-08-26· cited 4×
- Rivera v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-09-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.