Skip to main content

Rischitelli v. Safety Insurance

Citations

  • 423 Mass. 703
  • 671 N.E.2d 1243
  • 1996 Mass. LEXIS 303

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an assault after a car collision did not arise from the use of the car, but instead from the anger of assailant
  • stating that “the expression ‘arising out of indicates a wider range of causation than the concept of proximate causation in tort law”
  • finding that the plaintiffs claims for violation of Chapter 176D and Chapter 93A were not viable where coverage under the relevant insurance policy was found not to exist
  • finding no causal connection “when a battery [was] committed following the collision of two motor vehicles”
  • “ ‘arising out of’ indicates a wider range of causation than the concept of proximate causation in tort law”
  • injury did not arise out of use of automobile when injury resulted from assault and battery following automobile accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Rischitelli v. Safety Insurance

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.