Ripley v. United States
Citations
- 220 U.S. 491
- 31 S. Ct. 478
- 55 L. Ed. 557
- 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1692
Syllabus
<p>This court may not draw an inference of bad faith on the part of a government inspector unless the findings are so clear on the subject as to take the inference beyond controversy.</p> <p>It is the duty of the Court of Claims in dealing with the question of bad faith on the part of a government inspector to explicitly find the facts in regard to that subject.</p> <p>The Court of Claims should find as a fact whether or not complaints were made to the proper officers as to improper conduct on the part of subordinates, and if made, when and what action was taken thereon.</p> <p>Where proper findings are not made by the Court of Claims on specific • matters to enable this court to properly review the judgment, the record will be remanded to that court for additional findings as to such matters, United States v. Adams, 9 Wall. 661; and so ordered in this case, with instructions to return to this court with all convenient speed.</p> <p>45 C. Cl. 621, remanded with instructions.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that trial courts have a clear duty to make explicit findings and cannot merely offer “ambiguous expression^] susceptible of being construed one way or another”
- explaining that trial courts have a clear duty to make explicit findings and cannot merely offer “ambiguous expression[s] susceptible of being construed one way or another”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.