Naviant Marketing Solutions, Inc. v. Larry Tucker, Inc. Jeffrey W. Herrmann Robert D. Zatorski Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court abused its discretion when it ruled on a motion to compel without considering the good faith of the parties
• demanding more complete answers by the end of the week was not conferring in good faith
• noting the difference between \an attempt to confer\ and a \good faith attempt to confer\
• court found that Plaintiffs counsel’s refusal to discuss disputes with defense counsel over the telephone before invoking court intervention did not constitute a good faith conferral
• “Zealous advocacy … does not excuse a belligerent and uncompromising approach to the discovery process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).