Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/14/2009
Ripley v. Lanzer
Citations
- 215 P.3d 1020
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting spoliation argument that broken scalpel handle was discarded in bad faith in part because plaintiff’s lawsuit had not commenced and no request had been made to retain the handle
- no spoliation where testimony provides the same information offered by the evidence
- accident’s “ ‘occurrence is of itself sufficient to establish prima facie the fact of negligence on the part of the defendant, without further direct proof’ ” (quoting Metro. Mort. & Sec. Co. v. Wash. Water Power, 37 Wn. App. 241, 243, 679 P.2d 943 (1984))
- “Negligence and causation, like other facts, may of course be proved by circumstantial evidence.” “A res ipsa loquitur case is ~ “[R]es ipsa loquitur is a rule of evidence that allows an inference of negligence from circumstantial evidence to prove a defendant’s breach of duty where (1
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cox
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Curtis v. LeinWashington Supreme Court· 2010-09-16· cited 34×
- Tavai v. Walmart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-08-13· cited 26×
- Raymond Cook et ux v. Tarbert Logging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-10-01· cited 23×
- Grove v. PeaceHealth St. Joseph HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-10-28· cited 6×
- Raymond Grove v. Peacehealth St. Joseph's HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-10-28
- Seattle Tunnel Partners, V. Great Lakes Reinsurance (uk) Plc, RespsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2023-04-10
- Est. of Essex v. Grant County Pub. Hosp. Dist. No. 1Washington Supreme Court· 2024-04-11
- Marjorie Carroll, Appellant/cr-respondents V. Akebono Brake Corporation, Respondent/cr-appellantsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2022-08-01
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pedroza v. BryantWashington Supreme Court· 1984-02-16· cited 194×
- Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court· 1983-04-28· cited 144×
- Douglas v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court· 1991-08-15· cited 136×
- Henderson v. TyrrellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-03-14· cited 87×
- Zukowsky v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1971-09-02· cited 69×
- Hogland v. KleinWashington Supreme Court· 1956-07-03· cited 68×
- Pacheco v. AmesWashington Supreme Court· 2003-05-22· cited 46×
- Wagner Development, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-05-28· cited 38×
- Conrad v. Lakewood General HospitalWashington Supreme Court· 1966-02-03· cited 36×
- Covey v. Western Tank Lines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1950-05-13· cited 30×
- Tinder v. Nordstrom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-01-27· cited 30×
- State v. BugaiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-08-17· cited 28×
- Miller v. JacobyWashington Supreme Court· 2001-10-18· cited 28×
- Schoening v. Grays Harbor Community HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-05-29· cited 21×
- Bauer v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-05-13· cited 19×
- State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court· 1969-02-13· cited 17×
- Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities Co. v. Washington Water PowerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-04-03· cited 15×
- Wagner v. Deborah Heart & Lung CenterNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-04-01· cited 13×
- Callahan v. ChoE.D. Virginia· 2006-07-06· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.