Skip to main content
· 7/6/2006

Callahan v. Cho

Citations

  • 437 F. Supp. 2d 557
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45817
  • 2006 WL 1880414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiffs failure to present a certificate of merit, as required under West Virginia law, was fatal to plaintiffs claim
  • holding expert testimony essential where case hinged upon issue regarding defendant’s professional medical judgment
  • dismissing a claim for failure to comply with West Virginia’s “screening certificate requirement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.