Skip to main content

Ring v. State

Citations

  • 894 S.W.2d 944
  • 320 Ark. 128
  • 1995 Ark. LEXIS 179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that there was no prejudice resulting from the circuit court’s admission of a confession at the transfer hearing
  • idea behind juvenile code was “the notion of offering special protections to juveniles in the hopes of putting them on a separate track ending somewhere other than the Department of Correction”
  • when a young offender is ultimately charged in circuit court, the failure of law enforcement officers to obtain parental consent to waiver of right to counsel, pursuant to § 9-27-317, does not bar admissibility of confession
  • “We have repeatedly held that the crime of rape is by definition a violent offense. . . . Appellant’s argument that the crime of rape, in order to be classified as violent, requires additional threats or physical abuse independent of the rape is wholly without merit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glaze, Corbin, Brown, Newbern, Roaf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.