Misskelley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a defendant who was seventeen years old, possessed an IQ of 72, and read at the third-grade level voluntarily confessed
• holding no error in rejecting the appellant’s proffered instruction, even though that statement was based on language from case law, when the AMCI instruction was a proper statement of the law
• affirming the admission of a confession where the defendant was age seventeen, had an I.Q. of seventy-two, and was reading on a third-grade level
• affirming the admission of a confession where the defendant was age seventeen, had an I.Q. of seventy-two, and was reading on a third-grade level
• showing the accused gruesome photos of the victim and using a psychological diagram
• showing the accused gruesome photos of the victim and using a psychological diagram

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).