Court of Claims· 9/19/1979
Riley v. United States
Citations
- 221 Ct. Cl. 308
- 608 F.2d 441
- 1979 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 235
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiff who waited four years to challenge one OER and five years to challenge another before the SRB was not barred by the doctrine of laches
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bennett, Kunzig, Nichols
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hary v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1980-03-19· cited 109×
- Grieg v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1981-01-28· cited 57×
- Engels v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1982-05-05· cited 45×
- David S. Pepper v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1986-06-20· cited 33×
- Braddock v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1986-01-31· cited 19×
- Rawlins v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1982-08-11· cited 18×
- Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1989-03-02· cited 13×
- Muse v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1987-09-30· cited 8×
- Russell G. Johnson v. Thomas C. Reed, Secretary, United States Air Force, and United States of AmericaFifth Circuit· 1980-01-10· cited 7×
- Horn v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1982-02-24· cited 7×
- Germano v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1992-10-23· cited 5×
- Gruendyke v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1981-01-14· cited 5×
- ReidCourt of Claims· 1979-09-28· cited 4×
- Womack v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1996-02-07· cited 3×
- Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1990-11-30· cited 3×
- Fescina v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1987-04-22· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.