David S. Pepper v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a 6-year delay was inexcusable in concluding that the claim was barred by laches
• finding inexcusable for purposes of laches a delay of 6 years before the appellant first challenged the allegedly defective evaluation reports that served as the basis for his nonpromotion in military grade and eventual military discharge
• prejudice stemming from the payment of two salaries is presumed without any showing that they would be paid
• prejudice stemming from the payment of two salaries is presumed without any showing that they would be paid
• A fitness report “must be challenged within a reasonable time after it is issued.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).