Courie v. Alcoa Wheel & Forged Products

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts do not accept “allegations that [are] sufficiently fantastic to defy reality as we know it”
• granting a motion to dismiss a plaintiff's claim that his union discriminated against him on the basis of race, despite deeming the plaintiff's claim for relief \plausible\
• granting a motion to dismiss a plaintiffs claim that his union discriminated against him on the basis of race, despite deeming the plaintiffs claim for relief \plausible\
• identifying the same elements in the context of § 4112 reverse discrimination claims
• “[T]o say that Ohio courts narrowly define ‘extreme and outrageous conduct’ would be something of an understatement.”
• “Exactly how implausible is ‘implausible’ remains to be seen, as such a malleable standard will have to be worked out in practice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).