Ninth Circuit· 2/6/2018
Ricky Earp v. Ron Davis
Citations
- 881 F.3d 1135
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that abuse of discretion 12 occurs if “discovery is indispensable to a fair, rounded, development of the material facts”
- rejecting request for further discovery regarding possible prosecutorial 1 misconduct when missing evidence already permitted adverse inference sought by 2 petitioner
- affirming district court’s denial of further discovery 3 where petitioner’s allegations were “too attenuated and too speculative” to make a plausible 4 showing
- affirming district court’s denial of further discovery 5 where petitioner’s allegations were “too attenuated and too speculative” to make a plausible 6 showing
- affirming district court’s denial of 19 further discovery where petitioner’s allegations were “too attenuated and too speculative” 20 to make a plausible showing
- “Sitting as fact-finder, the trial court judge is tasked with 8 weighing and making factual findings as to the credibility of witnesses.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farris, Tallman, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Michael White v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2018-07-11· cited 38×
- Carlos Avena v. Kevin ChappellNinth Circuit· 2019-08-08· cited 28×
- Robert Leeds v. Perry RussellNinth Circuit· 2023-07-26· cited 21×
- Jones v. RyanD. Arizona· 2018-07-31· cited 4×
- Katie Garding v. Montana Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 2024-06-28· cited 4×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 7,022×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- United States v. HinksonNinth Circuit· 2009-11-05· cited 2,227×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 1,620×
- Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court· 1997-06-09· cited 1,476×
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 1,404×
- Donald Eugene Lambert v. James Blodgett, Donald Eugene Lambert v. James BlodgettNinth Circuit· 2004-12-28· cited 542×
- People v. EarpCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-06-24· cited 456×
- Juan H. v. Walter Allen IIINinth Circuit· 2005-07-08· cited 403×
- Kelly Park v. Karen ThompsonNinth Circuit· 2017-03-14· cited 306×
- Stanley Williams v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison, San QuentinNinth Circuit· 2004-09-09· cited 296×
- United States v. Aleksandrs v. LaurinsNinth Circuit· 1988-09-08· cited 217×
- Earp v. OrnoskiNinth Circuit· 2005-09-07· cited 209×
- Glover v. Bic Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1993-02-26· cited 209×
- Jerry Bartlett JONES, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tana WOOD, Respondent-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1997-06-12· cited 191×
- Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1978-08-31· cited 190×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.