Earp v. Ornoski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Sullivan test does not apply to conflict of interest arising from attorney’s romantic interest in 17 defendant
• “It is evident from the record that [the petitioner] has never received an opportunity to develop his claim .... The issue ... was raised on habeas, and neither the state court nor the district court allowed him an evidentiary hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).