Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 4/3/1990
Ricks v. State
Citations
- 82 Md. App. 369
- 571 A.2d 887
- 1990 Md. App. LEXIS 57
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the area deemed to be within an arrestee’s reach, lunge or grasp is broad” and is not necessarily limited by “apparent obstacles inhibiting an arrestee’s movement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garrity
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 3,483×
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-01-26· cited 3,191×
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,484×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-02-16· cited 83×
- Grant v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-06-08· cited 30×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-03-02· cited 25×
- Millwood v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-07-09· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.